| 747 | 8 | 17 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
semiosis是现代西方符号学的重要概念。从皮尔斯将该术语引入符号学说开始,后世学者便不断地进行着相关的探索和发展。本质上,它所反映的是一种三元动态的活动关系,这与洛特曼与西比奥克的经典符号理念完全一致。随着现代符号学研究的不断细化以及跨学科互动的兴盛,semiosis的内涵与分类也逐渐丰富,而且应用范围愈加广泛,跨越了索绪尔与皮尔斯传统的鸿沟,连接了三个地区的符号学研究。现代符号学将semiosis分为有机编码型、解释型以及文化型,有机编码型符号活动被用于生物体代码过程,而后两者则被用来描述动物及人类的意义产制。
Abstract：Semiosis is an important concept in modern Western semiotics. Peirce introduced this term into his doctrine of signs and this has led to the incessant related exploration and development by posterity of semiotics. The essence of semiosis is a reflection of triadic dynamic relation of action, which is in complete accord with classic Lotmanian and Sebeokian notions of signs. The constant refinement and the rise of trans-disciplinary interactions have promoted the enrichment of the content and classification of semiosis. In addition, the increasingly widespread application of semiosis has overcome the estrangement between the Saussurean and the Peircean traditions and connected three vast regions of semiotic inquiries. Modern Semiotics classifies semiosis into organic coding semiosis, interpretive semiosis and cultural semiosis, the first of which is applied to the coding process in organisms while the other two are applied to the meaning generation in animals and humans.
[1]Peirce,Charles Sanders.[1893–1913].The Essential Peirce:Selected Philosophical Writings[M],vol.II.Peirce Edition Project.Indiana:Indiana University,1998.
[2]Peirce,Charles Sanders.The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce[M],vols.1–6.Eds.Hartshorne,C.&Weiss,P.Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1931–1935;vols.7–8.Ed.Burks,A.W.Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1958.
[3]N?th,Winfried.Handbook of Semiotics[M],Bloomington and Indianapolis:Indiana University Press,1995.
[4]Fisch,Max H.Peirce's general theory of signs//Sight,Sound,and Sense[C],Ed.Sebeok,Thomas A.Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1978.
[5]薛忆沩:走进当代符号学的必经之路//书屋[J],1996年第1期。
[6]Yu,Hongbing.Enter the Dragon:Sebeok’s Chinese Connection//Biosemiotics[J],2013.DOI 10.1007/s12304-013-9165-9.
[7]胡壮麟:我国认知符号学研究的发展//当代外语研究[J],2013年第2期。
[8]Queiroz,Jo?o&Merrell,Floyd.Semiosis and pragmatism:Toward a dynamic concept of meaning//Sign Systems Studies[J],2006,34.1.
[9]Petrilli,Susan&Ponzio,Augusto.Semiotics Unbounded:Interpretive Routes through the Open Network of Signs[M],Toronto:University of Toronto Press,2005.
[10]Morris,Charles.Signs,Behavior and Language[M],Upper Saddle River:Prentice-Hall,Inc.,1946.
[11]Savan,David.An Introduction to C.S.Peirce Full System of Semei-otic[M],Toronto:Victoria College,1988.
[12]Eco,Umberto.A Theory of Semeiotics[M],Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1976.
[13]Derrida,Jacques.Of Grammatology[M],Spivak,G.C(trans.).Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1974.
[14]Allott,Robin.Language and the origin of semiosis//Sign Evolution in Nature and Culture[C],Ed.N?th,Winfried.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,1994.
[15]Lotman,Juri.Culture and Explosion[M],Ed.Marina Grishakova.Wilma Clark(trans.).Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2009.
[16]余红兵:文化符号学的新视角:符号的感知与意义的半自动生成//俄罗斯文艺[J],2012年第2期。
[17]Sebeok,Thomas&Danesi,Marcel.The Forms of Meaning:Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis[M],Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,2009.
[18]Susan Petrilli and Augusto Ponzio,Thomas Sebeok and the Signs of Life[M],Cambridge:Icon Books,2001.
[19]Barbieri,Marcello.Organic Semiosis and Peircean Semiosis//Biosemiotics[J],2012.DOI 10.1007/s12304-012-9161-5.
[20]Saussure,Ferdinand de.Course in General Linguistics[M],Wade Baskin(trans.),New York:Philosophical Library,1959.
[21]Barbieri,Marcello.Three Types of Semiosis//Biosemiotics[J],2009,No.2.
①遵循学界关于引用皮尔斯作品的传统,皮尔斯全集(The Collected Papers of Charles S.Peirce)与皮尔斯基要文集(The Essential Peirce)的引用格式分别为CP和EP,后加卷数与段数,首次引用加CP与EP,其后只加卷数与段数。
基本信息:
DOI：10.16238/j.cnki.rla.2014.02.020
中图分类号:H0
引用信息:
[1]余红兵.谈谈现代西方符号学的核心概念:semiosis[J].俄罗斯文艺,2014(02):105-110.DOI:10.16238/j.cnki.rla.2014.02.020.
基金信息:
江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目“西比奥克符号学思想研究”(CXZZ13_0380)的阶段性成果;; “江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目”(优势学科代码20110101)的科研成果