328 | 0 | 9 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
作为20世纪上半叶备受瞩目的现代主义文论代表,韦勒克和俄国形式主义者在各自的学术界革故鼎新、开天辟地。独特的研究经历使得韦勒克与形式主义者具有天然的亲近感。在评析批评流派和建构文学理论体系的过程中,韦勒克多次论及俄国形式主义并展开深入探讨。文学性、文学史和艺术整体观构成了二者诗学对话的主要议题,并体现出不同流派之间的平行近似之处。在围绕以上议题的核心内容——文学本质、文学的演变机制、文学作品的存在方式等进行阐析时,韦勒克既合理借鉴俄国形式主义文论,又针对其中尚不成熟的观点进行修正与深化,实现了对形式主义固有研究视野的实质性拓展。
Abstract:As the high-profile representatives of modernist literary theory in the first half of the 20th century, Wellek and Russian formalists made general reforms and broke new ground in their respective academic circles. Wellek's unique research experience gave him a natural closeness towards formalists. In the process of evaluating literary criticism schools and constructing a system of literary theory, Wellek mentioned Russian Formalism many times and held in-depth discussions. Literariness, literary history and conception of artistic unity constituted the main topics of the poetic dialogue between the two, and reflected the parallel similarities between different schools. In the process of analyzing the core content of the above topics — the essence of literature,the evolvement mechanism of literature, the mode of existence of literary works, Wellek was not only inspired by the literary theory of Russian formalism, but also revised and deepened the immature views therein, and achieved a substantial expansion of the inherent research vision of formalism.
[1]ФридлендерГ.М.Ккритикеметодологическихконцепцийсовременногобуржуазноголитературоведения[C]//Вопросыметодологиилитературоведения.М.:Ленинград:Наука.1966.
[2][比]乔治·布莱:批评意识[M],郭宏安译,百花洲文艺出版社,2010。
[3]ЯкобсонР.О.Новейшаярусскаяпоэзия[C]//Работыпопоэтике.М.:Прогресс.1987.
[4][美]勒内·韦勒克,奥斯汀·沃伦:文学理论[M],刘象愚等译,浙江人民出版社,2017。
[5][美]勒内·韦勒克:批评的诸种概念[M],罗钢等译,上海人民出版社,2015。
[6]Jakobson R.O.Closing Statement:Linguistics and Poetics Style in language[C]//Style in language.Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology.1960.
[7]ШкловскийВ.Б.Гамбургскийсчет:Статьи-воспоминания-эссе(1914-1933)[M].М.:Сов.писатель.1990.
[8]赵晓彬:什克洛夫斯基形式主义小说创作研究[M],中国社会科学出版社,2021。
[9]БарштК.А.РусскоелитературоведениеXXвека[M].Санкт-Петербург:РГПУим.А.И.Герцена.1997.
[10]Wellek.René.The Attack on Literature and Other Essays[M].Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press.1982.
[11][英]托尼·本尼特:形式主义和马克思主义[M],曾军等译,河南大学出版社,2011。
[12]ТыняновЮ.Н.Олитературнойэволюции[C]//Поэтика.Историялитературы.Кино.М.:Наука.1977.
[13]Erlich.Victor.Russian Formalism:HistoryDoctrine[M].The Hague:Mouton Publishers.1980.
[14]ТыняновЮ.Н.Литературныйфакт[C]//Поэтика.Историялитературы.Кино.М.:Наука.1977.
[15]ТыняновЮ.Н.ЯкобсонР.О.Проблемыизучениялитературыиязыка[C]//Поэтика.Историялитературы.Кино.М.:Наука,.1977.
[16][美]勒内·韦勒克:辨异:续《批评的诸种概念》[M],刘象愚等译,上海人民出版社,2015。
[17]ЖирмунскийВ.М.Вопросытеориилитературы[M].Ленинград:Academia.1928.
[18]李懿:蒂尼亚诺夫与维诺格拉多夫“序列”研究的融通与延展[J]//俄罗斯文艺,2021年第1期。
[19]Wellek.René.Concepts of Criticism[M].New Haven:Yale UP.1963.
[20]Wellek.René.Warren.Austin.Theory of Literature[M].New York:Harcourt.Brace&World.INC.1956.
基本信息:
DOI:10.16238/j.cnki.rla.2024.02.006
中图分类号:I0
引用信息:
[1]张珉.韦勒克对俄国形式主义文论的观照与拓展[J].俄罗斯文艺,2024(02):150-160.DOI:10.16238/j.cnki.rla.2024.02.006.
基金信息:
国家社科基金项目《什克洛夫斯基文艺理论与批评范式研究》(21BWW001)的阶段性成果