| 55 | 0 | 77 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
自1979年创刊以来，《今日诗学》在俄罗斯诗学的跨文化传播中发挥了重要作用。本文通过梳理该刊40余年间发表的相关作品，旨在揭示俄罗斯诗学在英语学界中的传播路径与接受机制。创刊初期，集中推出雅各布森、什克洛夫斯基、巴赫金、洛特曼等学者的成果，为俄罗斯诗学在英语学界建立了可见性框架；此后撰稿群体日趋国际化，俄罗斯诗学由显性议题转化为隐性理论支架。这种接受过程呈现出选择性吸纳、本土化调适与跨学科扩散等特征，并伴随着创造性误读与再阐释，使相关理论在后殖民批评、叙事学、媒体研究等领域焕发新生。然而，全球化语境下的“去背景化”倾向值得反思，学界需重视其历史语境与哲学纵深，避免理论的平面化挪用。
Abstract：Since its establishment in 1979, Poetics Today has served as a crucial platform for the cross-cultural transmission of Russian poetics. By examining this journal's publications across the past four decades, this paper traces the channels of dissemination and the mechanisms of reception through which Russian poetics entered English-language literary theory. In its formative years, the journal foregrounded the works of Jakobson, Shklovsky, Bakhtin, Lotman, and others, thereby constructing a visible framework for Russian poetics within Anglophone scholarship. As its contributor base grew increasingly international, Russian poetics gradually shifted from being an explicit subject of analysis to becoming an implicit theoretical foundation. This reception has been shaped by selective appropriation, localized adaptation, and interdisciplinary diffusion—often accompanied by creative misreadings and reinterpretations that revitalized Russian theories in such areas as postcolonial criticism, narratology, and media studies. Yet, the tendency toward de-contextualization in the era of globalization necessitates critical reflection. A renewed engagement with the historical and philosophical depth of Russian poetics is essential if scholarship is to avoid superficial appropriations and sustain the intellectual vitality of these traditions.
[1]Elsevier. CiteScore Metrics for Poetics Today.Scopus, 2024. Web.
[2]Sobchuk, Oleg. Yuri Lotman’s Semiotic Theory for Beginners[J]. Poetics Today. 34.4(2013).
[3]Kukkonen, Karin. Reading, Fast and Slow[J].Poetics Today. 42.2(2021).
[4]Jakobson , Roman, and Benjam in Hrushovski. Sign and System of Language:A Reassessment of Saussure’s Doctrine[J].Poetics Today. 2.1a(1980).
[5]Hrushovski, Benjamin. Roman Jakobson in His 85th Year[J]. Poetics Today. 2.1a(1980).
[6]Boym, Svetlana. Poetics and Politics of Estrangement:Victor Shklovsky and Hannah Arendt[J]. Poetics Today. 26.4(2005).
[7]Holquist, Michael, and Ilya Kliger. Minding the Gap:Toward a Historical Poetics of Estrangement[J]. Poetics Today. 26.4(2005).
[8]Tihanov, Galin. The Politics of Estrangement:The Case of the Early Shklovsky[J]. Poetics Today. 26.4(2005).
[9]Ehre, Milton. Review of The Dialogic Imagination:Four Essays, by M. M. Bakhtin,ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson[J].Poetics Today. 5.1(1984).
[10]Ronen, Ruth. Review of Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics by Mikhail Bakhtin[J].Poetics Today. 6.3(1985).
[11]Suvin, Darko. Approach to Topoanalysis and to the Paradigmatics of Dramaturgic Space[J].Poetics Today. 8.2(1987).
[12]Tihanov, Galin. On the Significance of Historical Poetics:In Lieu of a Foreword[J].Poetics Today. 38.3(2017).
[13]Hartley, Daniel. Style in the Novel:Toward a Critical Poetics[J]. Poetics Today. 39.1(2018).
[14]Lotman, Jurij M., and Julian Graffy. The Origin of Plot in the Light of Typology[J].Poetics Today. 1.1–2(1979).
[15]O’Toole, Lawrence M. Dimensions of Semiotic Space in Narrative[J]. Poetics Today. 1.4(1980).
[16]Gribanov, Alexander, and Masha Kowell.Samizdat according to Andropov[J]. Poetics Today. 30.1(2009).
[17]Komaromi, Ann. Samizdatas Extra Gutenberg Phenomenon[J]. Poetics Today.29.4(2008).
[18]Perovic, Sanja. No Future or Still in Year One? Revisionist versus Lyricist Approaches to the French Revolution[J]. Poetics Today.37.2(2016).
[19]Hitchcock, Peter. The Leninist Hypothesis[J].Poetics Today. 37.2(2016).
[20]McHale, Brian. Interview with Poetics Today Editor Brian McHale[EB/OL]//Duke University Press Blog.(2016-08-09)[2025-10-12]. https://dukeupress.wordpress.com/2016/08/09/interview-with-poeticstoday-editor-brian-mchale/.
[21]Lemon, Lee T., and Marion J. Reis. Russian Formalist Criticism:Four Essays[M].Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press, 1965.
[22]Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics[M]. Trans. and Ed. Caryl Emerson.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1984.
[23]Warner, Julie. Adolescents’ Dialogic Composing With Mobile Phones:Addressivity, Heteroglossia and Internally Persuasive Discourse[J]. Journal of Literacy Research. 48.2(2016).
[24]Bordwell, David. Narration in the Fiction Film[M]. Madison:University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.
[25]Lotman, Yuri M. Universe of the Mind:A Semiotic Theory of Culture[M]. London:I. B.Tauris&Co Ltd., 1990.
[26]Silverstone, Roger. Television and Everyday Life[M]. London:Routledge, 1994.
[27]Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence:A Theory of Poetry[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1973.
[28]Stam, Robert. Subversive Pleasures:Bakhtin,Cultural Criticism, and Film[M]. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
[29]Jameson, Fredric. The Prison-House of Language:A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1972.
[30]Wellek, René, and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature[M]. New York:Harcourt, Brace&Company, 1949.
[31]Lotman, Yuri M. The Structure of the Artistic Text[M]. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan,1977.
[32]Fiske, John. Television Culture[M]. Methuen:Methuen&Co., 1987.
[33]Holquist, Michael. Dialogism:Bakhtin and His World[M]. London:Routledge, 1990.
(1)poetics是欧洲最古老的文论概念之一，相比于欧陆国家，英语国家对它的认识局限于“作诗法”而长期缺乏“发育”的土壤；20世纪70年代以来，在外力的强劲刺激下，英语诗学发生剧烈的现代转型，这从被辞书收录为词条及其释义情况可见一斑。详情参阅：洪昕、凌建侯：俄罗斯诗学背后的“故事”——凌建侯教授访谈录[J]//广东外语外贸大学学报，2024年第5期。
基本信息:
DOI：10.16238/j.cnki.rla.2026.01.002
中图分类号:G237.5;I512.072
引用信息:
[1]郑春光,张佳宁.从《今日诗学》看俄罗斯诗学对英语诗学的影响[J].俄罗斯文艺,2026(01):44-57.DOI:10.16238/j.cnki.rla.2026.01.002.
基金信息:
国家社科基金重大项目“俄罗斯诗学学派研究”（22&ZD286）的阶段性成果
2026-01-15
2026-01-15